Tuesday, February 19, 2008

This Year You Draw Your Thesis!

My #1 point from last night's reviews - on all counts:

There is not enough work being produced

Well, sifting through my collection of news I found this story from NPR's Talk of the Nation, talking with an author, the story is called Stop Reading and Start Writing and it's an interview and Q&A with author Walter Mosley.

If you don't believe me that you need to loosen up and make more work? Listen to this story.

Replace the word Author with Architect, Novel with Thesis, Plot with Theory, Characters with Details, you get the gist.

The act of creating writing and design are linked, it's why you have to write a thesis document, it's also why so many architects are interested in language. You simply have to get into the groove of working, regularly, and steadily towards achievable goals. Your not going to sit down in a moment of inspiration and finish the entire thesis, you need to spend the time and effort to produce work that we can talk about.

As I said last night - I'm no longer interested in talking about stuff that isn't drawn, built, pictured, or worked on. It's time to produce, it's time to think about the architectural scales, the human scales, and how these spaces go together to support the great ideas you guys have.

  • You don't need any of the three thesis advisers to tell you how to make progress, to make progress.
  • You don't have to wait to ask a question you can email.
  • While your waiting for help on one thing, you can be working on at least six other things (you might answer your own question)
Work! Create! Make! Draw! This is your one and only time to do your thesis project, you've spent the past 4 1/2 years to get to this point, you've got 3 months left.

Give yourself a daily schedule of achievements to make and make them.

See you Thursday or Friday in person, on the blogs, and email before that.



Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Moving Ahead for Monday

To keep us moving forward:

Immediately:
  1. Please post reactions and notes from the 1/4 Jury Discussion no later than Thursday, sooner would be better.
For Sunday 5PM, to be posted to your blog:

  1. 250 word or less thesis abstract
    • identify the key problem, issue or stance you are taking
    • identify your solution, or proposal
    • define any key term or title clearly
    • be specific, clear and concise
    • avoid broad statements and sweeping generalities

For Monday:
  1. Make a list elements of the presentation you feel you need to work on, misrepresented in the jury, need to speak better about. We will keep this as a running list to update and improve upon.
  2. Rework, adapt, update, clarify, add any/all diagrams and site explanations as asked for and commented on by the jury (This will be an emergency reprieve, but it is important to get these out of the way so we can continue with other necessary studies)

Sunday, February 10, 2008

The Futurist Manifesto

We have been up all night, my friends and I, beneath mosque lamps whose brass cupolas are bright as our souls, because like them they were illuminated by the internal glow of electric hearts. And trampling underfoot our native sloth on opulent Persian carpets, we have been discussing right up to the limits of logic and scrawling the paper with demented writing.

Our hearts were filled with an immense pride at feeling ourselves standing quite alone, like lighthouses or like the sentinels in an outpost, facing the army of enemy stars encamped in their celestial bivouacs. Alone with the engineers in the infernal stokeholes of great ships, alone with the black spirits which rage in the belly of rogue locomotives, alone with the drunkards beating their wings against the walls.

Then we were suddenly distracted by the rumbling of huge double decker trams that went leaping by, streaked with light like the villages celebrating their festivals, which the Po in flood suddenly knocks down and uproots, and, in the rapids and eddies of a deluge, drags down to the sea.

Then the silence increased. As we listened to the last faint prayer of the old canal and the crumbling of the bones of the moribund palaces with their green growth of beard, suddenly the hungry automobiles roared beneath our windows.

`Come, my friends!' I said. `Let us go! At last Mythology and the mystic cult of the ideal have been left behind. We are going to be present at the birth of the centaur and we shall soon see the first angels fly! We must break down the gates of life to test the bolts and the padlocks! Let us go! Here is they very first sunrise on earth! Nothing equals the splendor of its red sword which strikes for the first time in our millennial darkness.'

We went up to the three snorting machines to caress their breasts. I lay along mine like a corpse on its bier, but I suddenly revived again beneath the steering wheel - a guillotine knife - which threatened my stomach. A great sweep of madness brought us sharply back to ourselves and drove us through the streets, steep and deep, like dried up torrents. Here and there unhappy lamps in the windows taught us to despise our mathematical eyes. `Smell,' I exclaimed, `smell is good enough for wild beasts!'

And we hunted, like young lions, death with its black fur dappled with pale crosses, who ran before us in the vast violet sky, palpable and living.

And yet we had no ideal Mistress stretching her form up to the clouds, nor yet a cruel Queen to whom to offer our corpses twisted into the shape of Byzantine rings! No reason to die unless it is the desire to be rid of the too great weight of our courage!

We drove on, crushing beneath our burning wheels, like shirt-collars under the iron, the watch dogs on the steps of the houses.

Death, tamed, went in front of me at each corner offering me his hand nicely, and sometimes lay on the ground with a noise of creaking jaws giving me velvet glances from the bottom of puddles.

`Let us leave good sense behind like a hideous husk and let us hurl ourselves, like fruit spiced with pride, into the immense mouth and breast of the world! Let us feed the unknown, not from despair, but simply to enrich the unfathomable reservoirs of the Absurd!'

As soon as I had said these words, I turned sharply back on my tracks with the mad intoxication of puppies biting their tails, and suddenly there were two cyclists disapproving of me and tottering in front of me like two persuasive but contradictory reasons. Their stupid swaying got in my way. What a bore! Pouah! I stopped short, and in disgust hurled myself - vlan! - head over heels in a ditch.

Oh, maternal ditch, half full of muddy water! A factory gutter! I savored a mouthful of strengthening muck which recalled the black teat of my Sudanese nurse!

As I raised my body, mud-spattered and smelly, I felt the red hot poker of joy deliciously pierce my heart. A crowd of fishermen and gouty naturalists crowded terrified around this marvel. With patient and tentative care they raised high enormous grappling irons to fish up my car, like a vast shark that had run aground. It rose slowly leaving in the ditch, like scales, its heavy coachwork of good sense and its upholstery of comfort.

We thought it was dead, my good shark, but I woke it with a single caress of its powerful back, and it was revived running as fast as it could on its fins.

Then with my face covered in good factory mud, covered with metal scratches, useless sweat and celestial grime, amidst the complaint of staid fishermen and angry naturalists, we dictated our first will and testament to all the living men on earth.

MANIFESTO OF FUTURISM

  1. We want to sing the love of danger, the habit of energy and rashness.
  2. The essential elements of our poetry will be courage, audacity and revolt.
  3. Literature has up to now magnified pensive immobility, ecstasy and slumber. We want to exalt movements of aggression, feverish sleeplessness, the double march, the perilous leap, the slap and the blow with the fist.
  4. We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. A racing automobile with its bonnet adorned with great tubes like serpents with explosive breath ... a roaring motor car which seems to run on machine-gun fire, is more beautiful than the Victory of Samothrace.
  5. We want to sing the man at the wheel, the ideal axis of which crosses the earth, itself hurled along its orbit.
  6. The poet must spend himself with warmth, glamour and prodigality to increase the enthusiastic fervor of the primordial elements.
  7. Beauty exists only in struggle. There is no masterpiece that has not an aggressive character. Poetry must be a violent assault on the forces of the unknown, to force them to bow before man.
  8. We are on the extreme promontory of the centuries! What is the use of looking behind at the moment when we must open the mysterious shutters of the impossible? Time and Space died yesterday. We are already living in the absolute, since we have already created eternal, omnipresent speed.
  9. We want to glorify war - the only cure for the world - militarism, patriotism, the destructive gesture of the anarchists, the beautiful ideas which kill, and contempt for woman.
  10. We want to demolish museums and libraries, fight morality, feminism and all opportunist and utilitarian cowardice.
  11. We will sing of the great crowds agitated by work, pleasure and revolt; the multi-colored and polyphonic surf of revolutions in modern capitals: the nocturnal vibration of the arsenals and the workshops beneath their violent electric moons: the gluttonous railway stations devouring smoking serpents; factories suspended from the clouds by the thread of their smoke; bridges with the leap of gymnasts flung across the diabolic cutlery of sunny rivers: adventurous steamers sniffing the horizon; great-breasted locomotives, puffing on the rails like enormous steel horses with long tubes for bridle, and the gliding flight of aeroplanes whose propeller sounds like the flapping of a flag and the applause of enthusiastic crowds.

It is in Italy that we are issuing this manifesto of ruinous and incendiary violence, by which we today are founding Futurism, because we want to deliver Italy from its gangrene of professors, archaeologists, tourist guides and antiquaries.

Italy has been too long the great second-hand market. We want to get rid of the innumerable museums which cover it with innumerable cemeteries.

Museums, cemeteries! Truly identical in their sinister juxtaposition of bodies that do not know each other. Public dormitories where you sleep side by side for ever with beings you hate or do not know. Reciprocal ferocity of the painters and sculptors who murder each other in the same museum with blows of line and color. To make a visit once a year, as one goes to see the graves of our dead once a year, that we could allow! We can even imagine placing flowers once a year at the feet of the Gioconda! But to take our sadness, our fragile courage and our anxiety to the museum every day, that we cannot admit! Do you want to poison yourselves? Do you want to rot?

What can you find in an old picture except the painful contortions of the artist trying to break uncrossable barriers which obstruct the full expression of his dream?

To admire an old picture is to pour our sensibility into a funeral urn instead of casting it forward with violent spurts of creation and action. Do you want to waste the best part of your strength in a useless admiration of the past, from which you will emerge exhausted, diminished, trampled on?

Indeed daily visits to museums, libraries and academies (those cemeteries of wasted effort, calvaries of crucified dreams, registers of false starts!) is for artists what prolonged supervision by the parents is for intelligent young men, drunk with their own talent and ambition.

For the dying, for invalids and for prisoners it may be all right. It is, perhaps, some sort of balm for their wounds, the admirable past, at a moment when the future is denied them. But we will have none of it, we, the young, strong and living Futurists!

Let the good incendiaries with charred fingers come! Here they are! Heap up the fire to the shelves of the libraries! Divert the canals to flood the cellars of the museums! Let the glorious canvases swim ashore! Take the picks and hammers! Undermine the foundation of venerable towns!

The oldest among us are not yet thirty years old: we have therefore at least ten years to accomplish our task. When we are forty let younger and stronger men than we throw us in the waste paper basket like useless manuscripts! They will come against us from afar, leaping on the light cadence of their first poems, clutching the air with their predatory fingers and sniffing at the gates of the academies the good scent of our decaying spirits, already promised to the catacombs of the libraries.

But we shall not be there. They will find us at last one winter's night in the depths of the country in a sad hangar echoing with the notes of the monotonous rain, crouched near our trembling aeroplanes, warming our hands at the wretched fire which our books of today will make when they flame gaily beneath the glittering flight of their pictures.

They will crowd around us, panting with anguish and disappointment, and exasperated by our proud indefatigable courage, will hurl themselves forward to kill us, with all the more hatred as their hearts will be drunk with love and admiration for us. And strong healthy Injustice will shine radiantly from their eyes. For art can only be violence, cruelty, injustice.

The oldest among us are not yet thirty, and yet we have already wasted treasures, treasures of strength, love, courage and keen will, hastily, deliriously, without thinking, with all our might, till we are out of breath.

Look at us! We are not out of breath, our hearts are not in the least tired. For they are nourished by fire, hatred and speed! Does this surprise you? it is because you do not even remember being alive! Standing on the world's summit, we launch once more our challenge to the stars!

Your objections? All right! I know them! Of course! We know just what our beautiful false intelligence affirms: `We are only the sum and the prolongation of our ancestors,' it says. Perhaps! All right! What does it matter? But we will not listen! Take care not to repeat those infamous words! Instead, lift up your head!

Standing on the world's summit we launch once again our insolent challenge to the stars!

F.T. Maniretti, 1909
The Futurist Manifesto

Manifesto of Futurist Architecture

No architecture has existed since 1700. A moronic cocktail of the most various stylistic elements that used to cover up the skeletons of modern houses is called modern architecture . The new beauty of cement and iron is profaned by the superimposition of motley decorative incrustations that neither constructive necessity nor our (modern) taste can justify, and whose origins are Egyptian, Indian or Byzantine antiquity, or that idiotic flowering of stupidity and importance that took the name of NEOCLASSICISM.


Italy welcomes these architectonic prostitutions, where greedy alien ineptitude masquerades as talented invention and extremely up-to-date architecture. Young Italian architects (those who borrow originality from a secret and compulsive consumption of art magazines) flaunt their talents in the new quarters, where a hilarious salad of tiny ogival columns, seventeenth-century foliation, Gothic pointed arches, Egyptian pilaster, rococo scrolls, fifteenth-century putti, and swollen caryatids take the place of style in all seriousness, and presumptuously display monumental airs. The kaleidoscopic appearance and reappearance of forms, the multiplication of machinery, the increasing daily needs imposed by the speed of communications, by the concentration of the populace, by hygiene, and by a hundred other phenomena of modern life, never cause these self-styled renovators of architecture a moment's perplexity or hesitation. They obstinately cling to the rules of Vitruvius, Vignola and Sansovino plus gleanings from any published scrap of information on German architecture that happens to be at hand. Using these, they continue to imprint the image of imbecility on our cities, our cities which should be the immediate and faithful projection of ourselves.


And so this expressive and synthetic art has become in their hands a vacuous stylistic exercise, a jumble of ill-mixed formulae to disguise a run-of-the-mill traditionalist box of bricks and stone as a modern building. As if we who are the accumulators and generators of movement, with all our added mechanical limbs, with all the noise and speed of our life, could live in streets built for the needs of men four, five or six centuries ago.


This is the supreme imbecility of modern architecture, perpetuated by the venal complicity of the academies, the internment camps of the intelligentsia, where the young are forced into the onanistic recopying of classical models instead of throwing open their minds in the search for new frontiers and in the solution of the new and pressing problem: THE FUTURIST HOUSE AND CITY. The house and city that are ours both spiritually and materially, in which our tumult can rage without seeming a grotesque anachronism.


The problem posed in Futurist architecture is not one of linear rearrangement. It is not a question of finding new mouldings and frames for windows and doors, of replacing columns, pilasters and corbels with caryatids, flies and frogs. Neither has it to do with leaving a façade in bare brick, or plastering it, or facing it with stone, or in determining formal differences between the new building and the old one. It is a question of tending the healthy growth of the Futurist house, of constructing it with all the resources of technology and science, satisfying magisterially all the demands of our habits and our spirit, trampling down all that is grotesque and antithetical (tradition, style, aesthetics, proportion), determining new forms, new lines, a new harmony of profiles and volumes, an architecture whose reason for being can be found solely within the unique conditions of modern life, and in its correspondence with the aesthetic values of our sensibilities. This architecture cannot be subjected to any law of historical continuity. It must be new, just as our state of mind is new.


The art of construction has been able to evolve with time, and to pass from one style to another, while maintaining unaltered the general characteristics of architecture, because in the course of history changes of fashion are frequent and are determined by the alternations of religious conviction and political disposition. But profound environmental changes are extremely rare, changes that unhinge and renew, such as the discovery of natural laws, the perfecting of mechanical means, the rational and scientific use of material. In modern life the process of stylistic development in architecture has been brought to a halt. ARCHITECTURE NOW MAKES A BREAK WITH TRADITION. IT MUST PERFORCE MAKE A FRESH START.


Calculations based on the resistance of materials, on the use of reinforced concrete and steel, exclude architecture in the classical and traditional sense. Modern construction materials and scientific concepts are absolutely incompatible with the disciplines of historical styles, and are the principle cause of the grotesque appearance of fashionable buildings in which attempts are made to employ the lightness, the superb grace of the steel beam, the delicacy of reinforced concrete, in order to obtain the heavy curve of the arch and the bulkiness of marble.


The utter antithesis between the modern world and the old is determined by all those things that were formerly non-existent. Our lives have been enriched by elements the possibility of whose existence the ancient did not even suspect. Men have identified material contingencies, and revealed spiritual attitudes, whose repercussions are felt in a thousand ways. Principal among these is the formation of a new ideal of beauty that is still obscure and embryonic, but whose fascination is already felt even by the masses. We have lost our predilection for the monumental, the heavy, the static, and we have enriched our sensibility with a taste for the light, the practical, the ephemeral and the swift. We no longer feel ourselves to be the men of the cathedrals, the palaces and the podiums. We are the men of the great hotels, the railway stations, the immense streets, colossal ports, covered markets, luminous arcades, straight roads and beneficial demolitions.


We must invent and rebuild the Futurist city like an immense and tumultuous shipyard, agile, mobile and dynamic in every detail; and the Futurist house must be like a gigantic machine. The lifts must no longer be hidden away like tapeworms in the niches of stairwells; the stairwells themselves, rendered useless, must be abolished, and the lifts must scale the lengths of the façade like serpents of steel and glass. The house of concrete, glass and steel, stripped of paintings and sculpture, rich only in the innate beauty of its lines and relief, extraordinarily ugly in its mechanical simplicity, higher and wider according to need rather than the specifications of municipal laws. It must soar up on the brink of a tumultuous abyss: the street will no longer be like a doormat at ground level, but will plunge many floors down into the earth, embracing the metropolitan traffic, and will be linked up by metal gangways and swift-moving pavements for necessary interconnections.


THE DECORATIVE MUST BE ABOLISHED. The problem of Futurist architecture must be resolved, not by continuing to pilfer from Chinese, Persian or Japanese photographs or fooling around with the rules of Vitruvius, but through flashes of genius and through scientific and technical expertise. Everything must be revolutionized. Roofs and underground spaces must be utilized; the façade must be diminished in its importance; issues of taste must be transferred from the field of fussy mouldings, finicky capitals and flimsy doorways to the broader concerns of BOLD GROUPINGS AND MASSES, and LARGE-SCALE DISPOSITION OF PLANES. Let us bring monumental, funereal and commemorative architecture to an end. Let us overturn monuments, pavements, arcades and flights of steps; let us sink the streets and squares; let us raise the level of the city.

I COMBAT AND DESPISE:
1. All the pseudo-architecture of the avant-garde, Austrian, Hungarian, German and American;
2. All classical architecture, solemn, hieratic, scenographic, decorative, monumental, pretty and pleasing;
3. The embalming, reconstruction and reproduction of ancient monuments and places;
4. Perpendicular and horizontal lines, cubical and pyramidal forms that are static, solemn, aggressive are absolutely excluded from utterly new sensibility;
5. The use of massive, voluminous, durable, antiquated and costly materials.


AND PROCLAIM:
1. That Futurist architecture is the architecture of calculation, of audacious temerity and of simplicity; the architecture of reinforced concrete, of steel, glass, cardboard, textile fibre, and of all those substitutes for wood, stone and brick that allow us to obtain maximum elasticity and lightness;
2. That Futurist architecture is not because of this an arid combination of practicality
and usefulness, but remains art, i.e. a synthesis and expression;
3. That oblique and elliptic lines are dynamic, and by their very nature possess an emotive power a thousand times stronger than perpendiculars and horizontals. And that no integral, dynamic architecture can exist that does not include these;
3. That decoration as an element superimposed on architecture is absurd, and that THE DECORATIVE VALUE OF FUTURIST ARCHITECTURE DEPENDS SOLELY ON THE USE AND ORIGINAL ARRANGEMENT OF RAW OR BARE OR CHROMATICALLY VIOLENT MATERIALS;
4. That, just as the ancients drew inspiration for their art from elements of nature, we-who are materially and spiritually artificial-must find that inspiration in the elements of the utterly new mechanical world we have created, and of which architecture must be the most beautiful expression, the most complete synthesis, the most efficacious integration;
5. That architecture as the art of formal arrangement according to pre-established criteria is finished;
6. That by the term architecture is meant the endeavor to harmonize the environment and Humanity with freedom and great audacity, that is to transform the world of things into a direct projection of the world of the spirit;
7. No formal or linear habit can grow from an architecture conceived this way, since the fundamental characteristics of Futurist architecture will be its impermanence and transience. THINGS WILL ENDURE LESS THAN US. EVERY GENERATION MUST BUILD ITS OWN CITY. This constant renovation of the architectonic environment will contribute to the Futurist victory already affirmed by WORDS-IN-FREEDOM, PLASTIC DYNAMISM, MUSIC WITHOUT QUADRATURE AND THE ART OF NOISES, and for which we fight ceaselessly against traditionalist cowardice.


Antonio Sant'Elia, 1914
MANIFESTO OF FUTURIST ARCHITECTURE

Lebbeus Woods: Manifesto

Architecture and war are not incompatible. Architecture is war. War is architecture.
I am at war with my time, with history, with all authority that resides in fixed and frightened forms.
I am one of millions who do not fit in who have no home, no family,no doctrine, nor firm place to call my own, no known beginning or end, no 'sacred and primordial site;.
I declare war on all icons and finalities, on all histories that would chain me with my own falseness, my own pitiful fears. I know only moments, and lifetimes that are as moments, and forms that appear with infinite strength then 'melt into air'.
I am an architect, a constructor of worlds, a sensualist who worships the flesh, the melody, a silhouette against the darkening sky.I cannot know your name. Nor can you know mine
Tomorrow, we begin together the construction of the city.

Lebbeus Woods 1993 Theory and Experimentation

Friday, February 8, 2008

Monument to 1300 Years

0747 1300 Years Monument (Of Bulgaria being Called Bulgaria)

in bulgaria.

I don't know much else about it, but it is, and I do not use this term lightly: freakin' awesome.

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

An arguement in support of brute force (architecturally speaking)

Evidently it is an evening of short notes.

Maybe you know this already, maybe you don't:

Did you know Robert Venturi went through 10 design iterations before he finally settled on the design for his mother's house...founded the post-modern movement and kicked architectural but for the rest of the century?

Say what you will about the guy, but anyone who keeps thier mom hanging on that long, because they've gotta produce that much work gets a tip of the hat.

For tuesday I wanna see more work than you can possible think of, because you shouldn't be thinking - just producing!

Below this I'm going to update links for each of you thesis-ers for you to check over the week.

Adam











-walls/graffiti
-moving sculpture

Jesse













-good green building photos
-green building section case study

-another one
-solar studies
-perspective, site approach, ventilation

-office tower w/o AC

Kristin
-local resources
-Tim McD interview, office next to site
onion flats, the office
politics around your site

Nate
-more oil rigs
-underwater explorer stuff
-the standard diving dress

Paul











-hejduk
-rossi (1) (2) (3)

Tim
-bike route of philly (circulation)
-photography of the grotesque multi application of anatomy, forensics, and media
-12 monkeys
politics around your site